pic.gif (2871 bytes)

  Volume 3, Number 7: July 2000

Predictors of clinical outcome following percutaneous intervention for in-stent restenosis.

Clinical outcome after successful coronary angioplasty: impact of intracoronary stent implantation

Effect of carteolol hydrochloride on ocular blood flow dynamics in normal human eyes. 

Screening of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. 

 

Predictors of clinical outcome following percutaneous intervention for in-stent restenosis. 

Reference: Am J Cardiol 2000 Jun 15;85(12):1427-1431.


Percutaneous intervention for the first episode of in-stent restenosis was performed in 177 patients 5.4 +/- 0.3 months after native coronary stent implantation. Medical records were reviewed and patients contacted 13.3 +/- 1.2 months after in-stent intervention to ascertain the subsequent clinical course. The effects of demographic, procedural, and angiographic variables on clinical outcomes were determined. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 93 +/- 3% and freedom from death,
myocardial infarction, and a third target artery revascularization (TAR) was 67 +/- 4%. The actuarial frequency of a third TAR was 26 +/- 4% at 1 year. Stratification of outcomes according to timing of in-stent intervention revealed an approximate twofold higher frequency of adverse events among patients with early (</=3 months) in-stent restenosis. Advanced age (p = 0.019), prior coronary bypass (p = 0.017), and early in-stent intervention (p = 0.006) independently predicted increased mortality at follow-up. Systemic hypertension (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.044), and early in-stent intervention (p <0.0001) independently predicted a third TAR. These variables (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, and p <0.0001, respectively) also independently predicted a composite end point consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and a third TAR. No angiographic variable predicted outcome after in-stent intervention. Thus, long-term outcome following in-stent intervention was favorable. Early
in-stent intervention, advanced age, hypertension, and diabetes predicted adverse outcomes.



Clinical outcome after successful coronary angioplasty: impact of intracoronary stent implantation

Reference:Scand Cardiovasc J 2000;34(2):178-81.


The clinical outcome after successful conventional coronary balloon angioplasty is compared with that of stent implantation after 30 days and 12 months. The study took place at the Divisions of Cardiology and Thoracic Radiology, Norrland University Hospital, Umea, a referral centre for northern Sweden. 

The first 100 consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina undergoing successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 1994 and the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing successful coronary stent implantation in 1995 were included. The cardiac endpoints studied were death, myocardial infarction, need for repeat PTCA or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Significantly more adverse cardiac events were observed in the PTCA group compared with the stent group. Event-free 12 months' follow-up (no deaths, myocardial infarction or re-intervention) was 64% in the PTCA group and 86% in the stent group (p < 0.005). The main explanation for the observed difference was a reduction in the need for a repeat PTCA (7 vs 18, p < 0.05) or CABG (4 vs 12, p < 0.05) in the stent group. Patients with stable or unstable angina who can
be treated with a stent have a better clinical outcome than those treated with coronary balloon angioplasty only


Effect of carteolol hydrochloride on ocular blood flow dynamics in normal human eyes. 

Reference:Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2000 Apr;104(4):226-31

PURPOSE: The effect of topical 2% calteolol hydrochloride on the ocular blood flow dynamics in normal human eyes was studied. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were studied using color Doppler imaging and scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. In the first experiments, one eye received 30 microliters of 2% carteolol hydrochloride twice daily for 7 days and the fellow eye a placebo in a randomized masked manner. The blood flow velocity of the central retinal artery, the ophthalmic artery, and the short posterior ciliary artery, the blood flow volume of the peripapillary retina (PPR), intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) and pulse rate (PR) were measured before treatment, 2 hours after the initial instillation, and after the last instillation on the 7th day. In the control experiments, 30 microliters of placebo was instillated in both eyes, and the above parameters were measured according to the same time schedule as in the first experiments.

RESULTS: In the carteolol-treated eyes, the systolic maximum (p = 0.012) and diastolic minimum (p = 0.019) blood flow velocities of the ophthalmic artery, and the blood flow volume of the superior (p = 0.003), central (p = 0.001) and inferior (p = 0.000) PPR showed significant increases in the first experments compared with the control experiments. IOP and OPP in both eyes showed significant reduction in the first experiments compared with the control study. 

CONCLUSION: These results indicated that topical carteolol hydrochroride increases the blood flow of the intraorbital
microcirculation and PPR



Screening of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. 

Reference: J Hepatol 2000 May;32(5):748-53.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy adversely affects daily functioning. The aim of this study was to determine which elements of daily life have predictive value for subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. 

METHODS: The study was performed in 179 outpatients with liver cirrhosis. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy was diagnosed using psychometric tests with normal values corrected for age (Number Connection Test A and the Digit Symbol Test) and automated analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG). Daily functioning was measured with the Sickness Impact Profile
(SIP), a quality of life questionnaire, containing 136 statements. Patients with and without SHE were compared for differences in response to all statements by univariate analysis, and subsequently by multivariate analysis of potential discriminating statements. 

RESULTS: SHE was diagnosed in 48 patients (27%). Thirty-six statements were significantly more often true for patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. Multivariate analysis showed that five statements of the SIP, related to alertness, sleep and rest, fine motor skills and work, have independent predictive power for subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: Combining these statements predictive for subclinical hepatic encephalopathy with patient characteristics enables physicians to assess the probability of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in the individual cirrhotic patient at the bedside or in the outpatient clinic.