hpic.gif (2871 bytes)

Volume 4, Number 10, October 2001

Method for the quantitative analysis of cilostazol and its metabolites in human plasma using LC/MS/MS.

Differential effects of cilostazol and pentoxifylline on vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with intermittent claudication.

Cilostazol for prevention of thrombosis and restenosis after intracoronary stenting
 

Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care
 


                   Method for the quantitative analysis of cilostazol and its metabolites in
                       human plasma using LC/MS/MS.

                       Reference: J Phar Biomed Anal 2001;26(4):637-50.

                       An LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of cilostazol, a quinolinone derivative,
                       and three active metabolites, OPC-13015, OPC-13213, and OPC-13217, in human plasma
                       was developed and validated. Cilostazol, its metabolites, and the internal standard, OPC-3930
                       were extracted from human plasma by liquid-liquid partitioning followed by solid-phase
                       extraction (SPE) on a Sep-Pak silica column. The eluent from the SPE column was then
                       evaporated and the residue reconstituted in a mixture of methanol/ammonium acetate buffer (pH
                       6.5) (2:8 v/v). The analytes in the reconstituted solution were resolved using reversed-phase
                       chromatography on a Supelcosil LC-18-DB HPLC column by an 17.5-min gradient elution.
                       Cilostazol, its metabolites, and the internal standard were detected by tandem mass spectrometry
                       with a Turbo Ionspray interface in the positive ion mode. The method was validated over a linear
                       range of 5.0-1200.0 ng/ml for all the analytes. This method was demonstrated to be specific for
                       the analytes of interest with no interference from endogenous substances in human plasma or from
                       several potential concomitant medications. For cilostazol and its metabolites, the accuracy
                       (relative recovery) of this method was between 92.1 and 106.4%, and the precision (%CV) was
                       between 4.6 and 6.5%. During the validation, standard curve correlation coefficients equalled or
                       exceeded 0.999 for cilostazol and its metabolites. These data demonstrate the reliability and
                       precision of the method. The method was successfully cross-validated with an established HPLC
                       method.



                    Differential effects of cilostazol and pentoxifylline on vascular endothelial
                       growth factor in patients with intermittent claudication.

                       Reference: Clin Sci 2001;101(3):305-11.

                       Cilostazol is a new phosphodiesterase inhibitor with anti-platelet and vasodilatory properties.
                       Cilostazol and pentoxifylline are the only two drugs that have been approved for the treatment of
                       patients with intermittent claudication. However, the mechanisms by which exercise tolerance is
                       improved remain unclear. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent endothelial
                       mitogen that results in angiogenesis when overexpressed in human subjects. To assess the
                       potential role of VEGF in the improvement in exercise tolerance, we investigated plasma levels of
                       VEGF in 50 patients with intermittent claudication who were allocated randomly to groups
                       receiving cilostazol (n=17), pentoxifylline (n=17) or placebo (n=16). Patients given either
                       cilostazol or pentoxifylline showed a significant improvements in maximal walking distance
                       compared with the placebo group (34 m and 33 m respectively, compared with 5 m; both
                       P<0.05). Neither cilostazol nor pentoxifylline increased the ankle-brachial index after treatment.
                       Circulating VEGF levels were increased (from 116+/-29 to 169+/-45 pg/ml; P=0.002), and the
                       levels of VEGF were correlated significantly with exercise tolerance in a positive direction
                       (r=0.88, P=0.004), in those patients treated with cilostazol that did not have diabetes mellitus. In
                       contrast, VEGF levels remained stable after the administration of pentoxifylline. These findings
                       suggest that VEGF may contribute to the cilostazol-related improvement in exercise tolerance in
                       non-diabetic patients. However, pentoxifylline did not affect VEGF levels, although a similar
                       improvement in maximal walking distance was achieved. Thus the mechanisms involved in the
                       pentoxifylline-treated group were different from those in the cilostazol-treated group, and require
                       further study.



                   Cilostazol for prevention of thrombosis and restenosis after intracoronary stenting

                       Reference: Ann Pharmacother 2001;35(9):1108-13.

                       OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential use of cilostazol in intracoronary stenting. DATA
                       SOURCES: Clinical literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-March 2001). Key
                       search terms included cilostazol, intracoronary stenting, and coronary angioplasty. Abstracts of
                       clinical trials presented at major cardiology professional association meetings were also reviewed.
                       DATA SYNTHESIS: Intracoronary stent placement represents the fastest growing medical
                       device implant. Complications of stent implantation include acute and subacute vessel closure, as
                       well as late restenosis. Currently, antiplatelet agents are used for preventive therapy. Cilostazol is
                       a vasodilating antiplatelet agent that reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation induced by many
                       factors. In seven randomized trials comparing cilostazol with either aspirin or ticlopidine,
                       cilostazol was found to be superior to aspirin and equivalent to ticlopidine in decreasing both
                       cardiac events and rates of restenosis. In addition, cilostazol was found to be well tolerated, with
                       no reports of adverse hematologic events. CONCLUSIONS: Although further comparative trials
                       are required, cilostazol appears to be a safe and effective alternative to clopidogrel and
                       glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists following intracoronary stent implantation.



                   Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care

                       Reference: JAMA 2001;286(11):1317-24.

                       CONTEXT: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis that
                       is common and is associated with an increased risk of death and ischemic events, yet may be
                       underdiagnosed in primary care practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of detecting
                       PAD in primary care clinics, patient and physician awareness of PAD, and intensity of risk factor
                       treatment and use of antiplatelet therapies in primary care clinics. DESIGN AND SETTING: The
                       PAD Awareness, Risk, and Treatment: New Resources for Survival (PARTNERS) program, a
                       multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted at 27 sites in 25 cities and 350 primary care
                       practices throughout the United States in June-October 1999. PATIENTS: A total of 6979
                       patients aged 70 years or older or aged 50 through 69 years with history of cigarette smoking or
                       diabetes were evaluated by history and by measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI). PAD
                       was considered present if the ABI was 0.90 or less, if it was documented in the medical record,
                       or if there was a history of limb revascularization. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as
                       a history of atherosclerotic coronary, cerebral, or abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease. MAIN
                       OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of detection of PAD; physician and patient awareness of
                       PAD diagnosis; treatment intensity in PAD patients compared with treatment of other forms of
                       CVD and with patients without clinical evidence of atherosclerosis. RESULTS: PAD was
                       detected in 1865 patients (29%); 825 of these (44%) had PAD only, without evidence of CVD.
                       Overall, 13% had PAD only, 16% had PAD and CVD, 24% had CVD only, and 47% had
                       neither PAD nor CVD (the reference group). There were 457 patients (55%) with newly
                       diagnosed PAD only and 366 (35%) with PAD and CVD who were newly diagnosed during the
                       survey. Eighty-three percent of patients with prior PAD were aware of their diagnosis, but only
                       49% of physicians were aware of this diagnosis. Among patients with PAD, classic claudication
                       was distinctly uncommon (11%). Patients with PAD had similar atherosclerosis risk factor
                       profiles compared with those who had CVD. Smoking behavior was more frequently treated in
                       patients with new (53%) and prior PAD (51%) only than in those with CVD only (35%; P
                       <.001). Hypertension was treated less frequently in new (84%) and prior PAD (88%) only vs
                       CVD only (95%; P <.001) and hyperlipidemia was treated less frequently in new (44%) and
                       prior PAD (56%) only vs CVD only (73%, P<.001). Antiplatelet medications were prescribed
                       less often in patients with new (33%) and prior PAD (54%) only vs CVD only (71%, P<.001).
                       Treatment intensity for diabetes and use of hormone replacement therapy in women were similar
                       across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of PAD in primary care practices is high, yet
                       physician awareness of the PAD diagnosis is relatively low. A simple ABI measurement identified
                       a large number of patients with previously unrecognized PAD. Atherosclerosis risk factors were
                       very prevalent in PAD patients, but these patients received less intensive treatment for lipid
                       disorders and hypertension and were prescribed antiplatelet therapy less frequently than were
                       patients with CVD. These results demonstrate that underdiagnosis of PAD in primary care
                       practice may be a barrier to effective secondary prevention of the high ischemic cardiovascular
                       risk associated with PAD.