pic.gif (2871 bytes)



TOP NUTRITION NEWSLETTER                      Volume 5 No11: November 2002 

Editorial 

This is the eleventh issue of TOP NUTRITION NEWSLETTER in 2002. In this issue  the following topics are updated for your interest. 

Immunonutrition: fact, fantasy, and future.

Immunonutrition in experimental colitis: beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids

Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study.

Therapeutic Lifestyle Change and Adult Treatment Panel III: Evidence Then and Now.
 

Any comments or suggestions to include the interesting topics are welcomed for future issues. 

Dr Shwe Win 
Editor 

line.gif (8968 bytes)



Immunonutrition: fact, fantasy, and future.

Reference:Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2002 Aug;4(4):332-7

Immunonutrients are molecular compounds that, while being dietary components, also influence immunologic response mechanisms. Substances such as glutamine, w-3 fatty acids, arginine, and/or ribonucleic acid have been added to standard nutritional support solutions, and the use of these formulations is known as "immunonutrition." A number of randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that recipients of immunonutrition have better outcomes than control subjects receiving standard nutritional support. However, it is possible that standard parenteral or enteral nutrition is actually harmful. We currently lack data from randomized trials showing the efficacy of immunonutrition compared with no nutritional support. Even if such information were forthcoming, these immunonutrients may simply be acting as pharmacologic agents. Finally, because each of these nutritive agents may either up- or downregulate the immune response, the effects may be disease-state specific.

                     

line.gif (8968 bytes)

 
Immunonutrition in experimental colitis: beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids

Reference: Arq Gastroenterol 2002 Jan-Mar;39(1):48-5

BACKGROUND: Recent data have given emphasis to the benefits of immunonutrition with omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) in various clinical situations. This work presents the results of parenteral administration of different lipid emulsions in experimental acute colitis and reviews the pertinent literature. 

METHODS: Seventy-four adult male Wistar rats were randomized in six groups that had 10% acetic acid-induced colitis (except CS). During 7 days, control groups CS (without colitis) and CC (with colitis) received physiological solution and the others received specific lipid emulsion by a central venous catheter (0.5 mL/h). The n-3/n-6 FA ratio and lipidic compositions were: group L--1:7.7 (LCT, n = 12), M--1:7.0 (MCT and LCT, n = 12), LW-3--1:4.5 (LCT plus FO, n = 12) and MW-3--1:3.0 (MCT and LCT plus FO, n = 13). Rats were evaluated to assess abdominal and intestinal alterations, macrophage cellularity and colonic concentrations of LTB4, LTC4, PGE2 and TXB2. 

RESULTS: N-3 FA treated rats (LW-3 and MW-3) presented less inflammatory abdominal alterations than CC rats. Mucosal ulcer formation in MW-3 group was the only comparable to CS group. Only CS, M and MW-3 rats presented smaller cellularity than CC group. Comparing to CC group, there were found smaller averages of LTB4 in CS, LW-3 and MW-3 groups, of PGE2 in CS, M and MW-3 groups, and of TXB2 in CS and MW-3 groups. LTC4 averages were not different. 

CONCLUSIONS: 1) LCT-containing lipid emulsion with low n-3/n-6 ratio do not modify inflammatory colitis derived manifestations; 2) the association of MCT/LCT-containing lipid emulsion with fish oil with high n-3/n-6 ratio impels great beneficial impact, attenuating morphological and inflammatory consequences and decreasing colonic concentrations of proinflammatory mediators.

           

line.gif (8968 bytes)

 Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study.

Reference: Am J Gastroenterol 2002 Sep;97(9):2255-62

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to define the indications for, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of, nutritional support in patients with acute pancreatitis. 

METHODS: All admissions during the 12-month period from January through December 2000, were entered into a common management protocol consisting of an initial 48-h fast with i.v. fluids and analgesics. After 48 h, those patients who were improving were restarted on oral feeding (group O). The remaining patients were randomized to receive nasojejunal (group EN) or parenteral feeding (group TPN). The randomization study was continued until 50 patients had been accrued. Outcomes in the three groups were compared with respect to length of hospital stay, duration of feeding, complications, and hospital costs. 

RESULTS: A total of 156 admissions were evaluated in the first 12 months. Of these, 87% patients had mild disease, 10% moderate, and 3% severe; 62% were related to alcohol abuse, 18% gallstones, and 8% idiosyncratic drug reactions. Of the patients, 75% improved on 48 h bowel rest and i.v. fluids, and were discharged within 4 days. The remainder were randomized to jejunal elemental (n = 26) or parenteral (n = 27) feeding. Duration of feeding was shorter with EN (6.7 vs 10.8 days, p < 0.05) and nutrition costs were lower, representing an average cost saving of $2362.00 per patient fed. EN was less effective in meeting estimated nutritional requirements (54 vs 88%, p < 0.0001), but metabolic (p < 0.003) and septic complications (p = 0.01) were lower. Subgroup analysis of patients with severe disease showed similar findings. 

CONCLUSION: Despite concerns that metabolic expenditure is increased and that food-stimulated pancreatic secretion might exacerbate the disease process, hypocaloric enteral feeding seems to be safer and less expensive than parenteral feeding and bowel rest in patients with acute pancreatitis.
                                   

                      
line.gif (8968 bytes)
Therapeutic Lifestyle Change and Adult Treatment Panel III: Evidence Then and Now.

Reference: Curr Atheroscler Rep 2002 Nov;4(6):433-43

The Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) has an extensive section on nonpharmacologic therapy for those with abnormal blood lipids. ATP III focused on the high-saturated fat atherogenic diet, obesity, and sedentary lifestyle and recommended a program of therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC). This review discusses several issues, including 1) why ATP III changed from the Step I and Step II diets to TLC; 2) the benefits of keeping trans fatty acid intake low and the addition of viscous fiber and plant stanol/sterol esters to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beyond that seen with the Step II diet; 3) the de-emphasis on total fat and a sharper focus on the kinds of fat ingested in the new guidelines; 4) the endorsement of regular physical activity and weight loss as important first steps in reversing the unwanted metabolic effects of the metabolic syndrome; and 5) the emphasis of health-promoting aspects of the diet that include, among other things, fish and omega-3 fatty acids. At all stages of TLC, ATP III encourages the referral to registered dietitians or other qualified nutritionists for medical nutrition therapy. TLC and the ATP III guidelines should provide guidance to practitioners who wish to get low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to goal (whether or not drugs are used), prevent or treat the metabolic syndrome, and improve the overall health of the patient.
                      

line.gif (8968 bytes)