Volume 1, Number 5: November 1998


Advantage of post-operative oral administration of UFT (tegafur and uracil) for completely resected p-stage I-IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.

Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers

Pathophysiology and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremity.

New Strategies in the Medical Management of Asthma


Advantage of post-operative oral administration of UFT (tegafur and uracil) for completely resected p-stage I-IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.

Source: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998 Sep;14(3):256-62; discussion 263-4


OBJECTIVE: Although adjuvant therapy after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported to be ineffective, it has been recently reported in prospective randomised studies conducted by two different groups in Japan that oral administration of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative drug, UFT (a combination drug of tegafur and uracil) can improve the post-operative survival [The Study Group of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer (Chubu, Japan). A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (the second cooperative study). Eu J Surg Oncol 1995;21:69-77; Wada, H., Hitomi, S., Teramatsu, T, West Japan Study Group for Lung Cancer Surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1048-1054]. To examine the
efficacy of UFT as post-operative adjuvant therapy, a retrospective study was performed.

METHODS: A total of 655 consecutive patients who underwent complete tumor resection for pathologic stage I-IIIa, NSCLC at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chest Disease Research Institute, Kyoto University between 1976 and 1992 were retrospectively reviewed. As post-operative adjuvant therapy, UFT was administrated to 98 patients (UFT group), and was not administered to the other 557 patients (Control group).

RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of the UFT group was 76.5%, which was significantly better than that of the Control group (5-year survival rate: 58.6%, P = 0.005). Stratified with pathologic stage, the efficacy of UFT was seen in the p-stage I disease (5-year survival rate: 88.6% for the UFT group, 72.0% for the Control group, P = 0.013) and in the p-stage IIIa, pN2 disease (5-year survival rate: 54.3% for the UFT group, 37.5% for the Control group, P = 0.037). Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors also revealed the efficacy of UFT (P = 0.004, 95% confidence interval of relative risk: 0.325-0.840). Post-operative intravenous chemotherapy or radiation therapy did not prove to be significant factors affecting the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of oral administration of UFT as post-operative adjuvant therapy for completely resected NSCLC was proposed. To confirm the efficacy, a prospective randomized study for a more homogenous patient group is needed.


Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers

Source: BMJ 1998;317:235-240 ( 25 July )

Objective: To quantify effect on mortality of administering human albumin or plasma protein fraction during management of critically ill patients.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing administration of albumin or plasma protein fraction with no administration or with administration of crystalloid solution in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia, burns, or hypoalbuminaemia.
Subjects: 30 randomised controlled trials including 1419 randomised patients.
Main outcome measure: Mortality from all causes at end of follow up for each trial.
Results: For each patient category the risk of death in the albumin treated group was higher than in the comparison group. For hypovolaemia the relative risk of death after albumin administration was 1.46 (95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.22), for burns the relative risk was 2.40 (1.11 to 5.19), and for hypoalbuminaemia it was 1.69 (1.07 to 2.67). Pooled relative risk of death with albumin administration was 1.68 (1.26 to 2.23). Pooled difference in the risk of death with albumin was 6% (95% confidence interval 3% to 9%) with a fixed effects model. These data suggest that for every 17 critically ill patients treated with albumin there is one additional death.

Key messages
  • Human albumin solution has been used in the treatment of critically ill patients for over 50 years
  • Currently, the licensed indications for use of albumin are emergency treatment of shock, acute management of burns, and clinical situations associated with hypoproteinaemia
  • Our systematic review of randomised controlled trials showed that, for each of these patient categories, the risk of death in the albumin treated group was higher than in the comparison group
  • The pooled relative risk of death with albumin was 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.23) and the pooled difference in the risk of death was 6% (3% to 9%) or six additional deaths for every 100 patients treated

Conclusions
Because this review was based on relatively small trials in which there were only a small number of deaths the results must be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, we believe that a reasonable conclusion from these results is that the use of human albumin in the management of critically ill patients should be reviewed. A strong argument could be made that human albumin should not be used outside the context of a properly concealed and otherwise rigorously conducted randomised controlled trial with mortality as the end point. Until such data become available, there is also a case for a review of the licensed indications for albumin use.



Pathophysiology and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremity.

Source: South Med J 1998 Oct;91(10):894-8

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting up to 62% of Americans with diabetes.

METHODS: We reviewed the literature using the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE search service. In total, we reviewed 54 articles.

RESULTS: Hyperglycemia leads to increased activity in the polyol pathway in nerve cells; this ultimately results in abnormal nerve function. Numerous pharmacologic agents have been used to treat symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, but all of these drugs can be associated with adverse side effects. Recent work has indicated that subsensory electrical stimulation may be preferred to pharmacotherapy, since it is equally effective and has a more favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSION: Although the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy is well understood, treatment of the symptoms associated with this condition can be challenging. Additional research is needed to reveal a safe and effective treatment for this debilitating sequela of diabetes mellitus.

How Is Diabetic Neuropathy Usually Treated?

Treatment aims to relieve discomfort and prevent further tissue damage. The first step is to bring blood sugar under control by diet and oral drugs or insulin injections, if needed, and by careful monitoring of blood sugar levels. Although symptoms can sometimes worsen at first as blood sugar is brought under control, maintaining lower blood sugar levels helps reverse the pain or loss of sensation that neuropathy can cause. Good control of blood sugar may also help prevent or delay the onset of further problems. Another important part of treatment involves special care of the feet, which are prone to problems.
A number of medications and other approaches are used to relieve the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy.

Relief of Pain

For relief of pain, burning, tingling, or numbness, the doctor may suggest an analgesic such as aspirin or acetaminophen or anti-inflammatory drugs containing ibuprofen. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be used with caution in people with renal disease. Antidepressant medications such as amitriptyline (sometimes used with fluphenazine) or nerve medications such as carbamazepine or phenytoin sodium may be helpful. Codeine is sometimes prescribed for short-term use to relieve severe pain. In addition, a topical cream, capsaicin, is now available to help relieve the pain of neuropathy.

The doctor may also prescribe a therapy known as transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulations (TENS). In this treatment, small amounts of electricity block pain signals as they pass through a patient's skin. Other treatments include hypnosis, relaxation training, biofeedback, and acupuncture. Some people find that walking regularly or using elastic stockings helps relieve leg pain. Warm (not hot) baths, massage, or an analgesic ointment such as Ben Gay may also help.

Gastrointestinal Problems

Indigestion, belching, nausea or vomiting are symptoms of gastroparesis. For patients with mild symptoms of slow stomach emptying, doctors suggest eating small, frequent meals and avoiding fats. Eating less fiber may also relieve symptoms. For patients with severe gastroparesis, the doctor may prescribe metoclopramide, which speeds digestion and helps relieve nausea. Other drugs that help regulate digestion or reduce stomach acid secretion may also be used or erythromycine may be prescribed. In each case, the potential benefits of these drugs need to be weighed against their side effects.

To relieve diarrhea or other bowel problems, antibiotics or clonidine HCl, a drug used to treat high blood pressure, are sometimes prescribed. The antibiotic tetracycline may be prescribed. A wheat-free diet may also bring relief since the gluten in flour sometimes causes diarrhea.

Neurological problems affecting the urinary tract can result in infections or incontinence. The doctor may prescribe an antibiotic to clear up an infection and suggest drinking more fluids to prevent further infections. If incontinence is a problem, patients may be advised to urinate at regular times (every 3 hours, for example) since they may not be able to tell
when the bladder is full.

Dizziness, Weakness

Sitting or standing slowly may help prevent light-headedness, dizziness, or fainting, which are symptoms that may be associated with some forms of autonomic neuropathy. Raising the head of the bed and wearing elastic stockings may also help. Increased salt in the diet and treatment with salt-retaining hormones such as fludrocortisone are other possible approaches. In certain patients, drugs used to treat hypertension can instead raise blood pressure, although predicting which patients will have this paradoxical reaction is difficult.Muscle weakness or loss of coordination caused by diabetic neuropathy can often be helped by physical therapy.

Urinary and Sexual Problems

Nerve and circulatory problems of diabetes can disrupt normal male sexual function, resulting in impotence. After ruling out a hormonal cause of impotence, the doctor can provide information about methods available to treat impotence caused by neuropathy. Short-term solutions involve using a mechanical vacuum device or injecting a drug called a vasodilator into the penis before sex. Both methods raise blood flow to the penis, making it easier to have and maintain an erection. Surgical procedures, in which an inflatable or semirigid device is implanted in the penis, offer a more permanent solution. For some people, counseling may help relieve the stress caused by neuropathy and thereby help restore sexual function.

In women who feel their sexual life is not satisfactory, the role of diabetic neuropathy is less clear. Illness, vaginal or urinary tract infections, and anxiety about pregnancy complicated by diabetes can interfere with a woman's ability to enjoy intimacy. Infections can be reduced by good blood glucose control. Counseling may also help a woman identify and cope with sexual concerns.



New Strategies in the Medical Management of Asthma


Source: American Family Physician 1998;July:89-108.

Asthma, a common chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, may be classified as mild intermittent or mild, moderate, or
severe persistent. Patients with persistent asthma require medications that provide long-term control of their disease and
medications that provide quick relief of symptoms. Medications for long-term control of asthma include inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, nedocromil, leukotriene modifiers and long-acting bronchodilators. Inhaled corticosteroids remain the most effective anti-inflammatory medications in the treatment of asthma. Quick-relief medications include short-acting beta2 agonists, anticholinergics and systemic corticosteroids. The frequent use of quick-relief medications indicates poor asthma control and the need for larger doses of medications that provide long-term control of asthma. New guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel II recommend an aggressive "step-care" approach. In this approach, therapy is instituted at a step higher than the patient's current level of asthma severity, with a gradual "step down" in therapy once control is achieved. The significant new strategies different from the past are the following.

The newly revised classifications for asthma are mild intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent and severe persistent.

If patients are using more than one canister of a quick-relief metered-dose inhaler per month, they are under poor control. Long-term control medications should be added or increased.

Asthma and its management still pose a challenge. However, recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology,
diagnosis and monitoring of asthma can help physicians optimize treatment strategies. Contemporary treatment guidelines
emphasize an aggressive approach, with the prompt and liberal use of anti-inflammatory medication to achieve long-term control of this inflammatory disease. It is increasingly recognized that successful asthma treatment requires a commitment from both patient and physician. Patient education can empower persons with asthma to begin guided self-management of their disease. Such shared responsibility will help to ensure a favorable clinical outcome and an enhanced quality of life.

Detailed information can be downloaded from http://www.aafp.org/afp/980700ap/gross.html.



 

| about us | activities | pharmaceutical information | products | web link to |
home
Thai Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.